ge5678598778918871930 4w8c
1
Trucksales Staff31 Jan 2024
NEWS

Gaol sentence shines light on CoR enforcement

The recent sentencing of a transport company’s operations manager shows our Chain of Responsibility laws in full effect, says NTI

Australian specialist insurer, National Transport Insurance (NTI), says last week’s sentencing of a transport fleet’s executive shows the full force of Australia’s Chain of Responsibility legislation, and the potentially drastic outcome for those who flout the law.

Drastic outcome

The National Operations Manager of the transport company behind the truck involved in Melbourne’s tragic 2020 Eastern Freeway accident, in which four police officers were killed after an impaired truck driver ploughed into them following an intercept for a speeding motorist, was sentenced to three years in gaol, over $100,000 in penalties and costs, and a 12-month ban from serving in similar transport roles.

The outcome represents the first time the country has seen an employee charged and sentenced for a Category One offence, sending a strong signal to anyone in the transport chain who doesn’t apply full care and attention to their role.

Individual duty

According to NTI’s Supply Chain Technical Manager, Aaron Louws, the case highlights how the National Heavy Vehicle Regulator (NHVR) can potentially bring charges against an individual, as opposed to only prosecuting an employer.

“The sentence sends a clear message to parties within the supply chain – the law will be enforced,” he said.

“What also makes this case ground-breaking is that the defendant was convicted as an ‘operator’ of a heavy vehicle for their failure to fulfil their primary duty.”

While an ‘operator’ is anyone who is ‘responsible for controlling or directing the use of a heavy vehicle’, the term can also encompass immediate managers or supervisors of drivers, along with senior management who have responsibility for the use and control of a heavy vehicle.

Lacklustre policies and procedures

The Court found the transport company in question had policies and procedures that were not appropriately implemented, adapted, and enforced, leading to the conviction of the firm and two of its executives.

“There were multiple examples of non-compliance with many aspects of the policies in the areas of recruitment, screening, the training of new workers, drug testing, recording work/rest time and adhering to work/rest requirements,” said Mr Louws.

“The actual implementation and enforcement of company processes never happened, and if they had, it’s possible this incident may not have occurred.

“We can all learn from this situation. It’s important to prove our standards are in place, and as an industry we work together to ensure that our actions/inactions do everything so far as is reasonably practicable, to ensure this couldn’t happen again.”

Share this article
Written byTrucksales Staff
See all articles
Stay up to dateBecome a trucksales member and get the latest news, reviews and advice straight to your inbox.
Subscribe today
Disclaimer
Please see our Editorial Guidelines & Code of Ethics (including for more information about sponsored content and paid events). The information published on this website is of a general nature only and doesn’t consider your particular circumstances or needs.
Love every move.
Buy it. Sell it.Love it.
®
© carsales.com.au Pty Ltd 1999-2025
In the spirit of reconciliation we acknowledge the Traditional Custodians of Country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their Elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.